Re: Fixed-width web pages - have some pity on designers!
Timothy Knox <tdk-cm3xKafaMiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:04:16 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.keyholes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Somewhere on Shadow Earth, at Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:59:05AM -0700, Scott Meyers wrote: > I don't see this behavior with IE6. All the pages there seem to come up > with the content fixed in width. Can you give me more details on your > environment and what you're seeing? Sure. I saw the same behaviour with NS4.7 and Opera 7.11 under Linux. Curiously, I don't see that behaviour myself under IE6.0 for Windows. Which, of course, means that those web designers may be guilty of a modern version of "All the world's a VAX" <http://www.jargon.net/jargonfile/v/vaxocentrism.html>, in thinking that all the world runs IE6 on mS Windows (instead of only 90+%). But that does not make them guilty of software keyholes. So let us leave that f'r-instance on the scrap heap of irrelevancy. > >Also, do websites like InfoWorld <http://www.infoworld.com/> qualify > >as what you are looking for? > > Again, I see only fixed-width content. What do others see? And again, it renders fine under IE6/Windows. So I promise, henceforth, when reporting possible problem websites, to try them under IE6/Windows before telling the list about them. ;) However, that does lead me to the question: Does designing a web site for a give typeface/size combination, such that if a surfer (like myself) who winds the point size up a bit, to ease the strain on bad eyes, sees a profoundly ugly or mal-formed page qualify as a software keyhole? I suspect that while it is definitely lousy usability design, it is not a software keyhole. -- Timothy Knox <mailto:tdk-cm3xKafaMiJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Let's just say that if complete and utter chaos was lightning, then he'd be the sort to stand on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting "All gods are bastards." -- Terry Pratchett, The Colour of Magic