Re: static virtual is a keyhole?
"White Wolf" <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Oct 2003 08:22:15 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.keyholes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <01e001c39080$cc37abc0$568dba50@Evo> |
Scott Meyers wrote: > It's > a different kind of gratuitious constraint, one arising from a > different kind of flawed thinking. One could argue that it's use of > a constant (the font size) instead of a variable, but the underlying > conceptual flaw is quite different: it's that the web page designer > didn't think that users should have any control over font size. The > underlying conceptual problem is that of a missing feature, not > imposition of a keyhole-like constraint. So though it's possible to > cast fixed-size fonts on web pages into the mold of a keyhole, I > think it dilutes the meaning of a keyhole, hence its usefulness. I think this thinking is not exactly right. Why? Because unless one fixes the font size of a Web page the browser agents are able to change the font size! So it is not the case of "I would need to work a lot to enable it". On the contrary. White Wolf