Re[2]: Comparison of high-level concurrency models?
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.language-of-the-year |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi John, >> I'm looking for a comparison of high-level concurrency models such as >> Actors, Tuplespace, Software Transactional Memory, and others that I >> may not have heard of. JC> And so, since I have burnt and crispy fingers, from playing with JC> concurrency.... JC> The only solutions on that I personally will believe in are ones which JC> are mind bogglingly simple... and impose harsh, but simplifying JC> restrictions on the programmers. This being the prag list, and hoping to save my own fingers from as much crispiness as possible, what would be the "harsh, but simplifying restrictions" you would impose, or what models/lanugages worked for you (or didn't)? My context is more distributed workflow oriented than pure HPC, but any thoughts based on your experience would be most welcome. Thanks, --Gregg