Re[2]: Comparison of high-level concurrency models?

Gregg Irwin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.language-of-the-year
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi John,

>> I'm looking for a comparison of high-level concurrency models such as
>> Actors, Tuplespace, Software Transactional Memory, and others that I
>> may not have heard of.

JC> And so, since I have burnt and crispy fingers, from playing with
JC> concurrency....

JC> The only solutions on that I personally will believe in are ones which
JC> are mind bogglingly simple... and impose harsh, but simplifying
JC> restrictions on the programmers.

This being the prag list, and hoping to save my own fingers from as
much crispiness as possible, what would be the "harsh, but simplifying
restrictions" you would impose, or what models/lanugages worked for
you (or didn't)? My context is more distributed workflow oriented than
pure HPC, but any thoughts based on your experience would be most
welcome. 

Thanks,

--Gregg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.