Re: F5 LTM hitting SSL TPS license limit
Kenneth Salchow <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4B18A8F75A6384449755BC7784073E935FE91C2E37@exch11.olympus.f5net.com> |
[Hamish Wrote] I can answer that one. The limit is connections only. You can test this by enforcing or removing HTTP keepalives. Some services (Patrol web interface springs to mind) require using oneConnect if you're offloading SSL to ensure you don't run out of SSL TPS's. [KJSJ] You are correct--the count is essentially a count of active client sessions being handled--not the number of requests within the secure session that takes place. It's worth noting however that there still appears to be confusion within F5 over what exactly constitutes an SSL TPS... It was only around september last year that an engineer tried to tell me that the v4 method of NOT counting resumed sessions was still valid for v9. In fact until recently it was even documented that way on the F5 website). (I think it's been ammended on tech.f5.com, but I could be wrong on that one). [KJSJ] You are, once again, correct. According to this solution https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/6000/400/sol6475.html, which was updated this past January, TPS counts both New SSL Sessions AND Resumed SSL Sessions. You are also correct in that there is some confusion even internally as to what constitutes a TPS. Hopefully, this conversation will help us fix that as well. KJ (Ken) Salchow, Jr. | Manager, Technical Marketing -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hamish Marson Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:19 AM To: Load Balancing Mailing List; Rosenberry, Eric Subject: Re: [load balancing] F5 LTM hitting SSL TPS license limit Quoting "Rosenberry, Eric" <[email protected]>: > Kenneth- > [deleted] > > Also, as a point of clarification- Do multiple HTTP GET requests > within a single TCP/SSL session count against the SSL TPS limit, or > is it only counted as a single connect. (I do know that resumed SSL > sessions that span multiple TCP connections are treated as separate > SSL setups license wise) > I can answer that one. The limit is connections only. You can test this by enforcing or removing HTTP keepalives. Some services (Patrol web interface springs to mind) require using oneConnect if you're offloading SSL to ensure you don't run out of SSL TPS's. It's worth noting however that there still appears to be confusion within F5 over what exactly constitutes an SSL TPS... It was only around september last year that an engineer tried to tell me that the v4 method of NOT counting resumed sessions was still valid for v9. In fact until recently it was even documented that way on the F5 website). (I think it's been ammended on tech.f5.com, but I could be wrong on that one). H ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3 KB) - not displayed