Replacing ldirectord/heartbeat with piranha/lvs/pulse
"Sean Drill" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E3E31C92D94ECA4CB1BCEF0D4F4339350A6E8A9B@carnifex.staff.wn.com.au> |
Hi there I have been having some issues implementing a new load balancing system, and was hoping someone could over some advice. Our current configuration is configured using ldirectord. The active node hosts all the virtual servers. Each virtual server will have an active real server, and a backup real server. All the traffic will be directed to the active real server, unless that server becomes unreachable, at which point all traffic will be directed to the backup server. In other words, a traditional real/fallback system. I am however only able to get piranha/lvs to do load sharing. In this case as long as both servers are set to UP, then traffic will be balanced between all servers (determined by load balancing scheme and weighting.) What I am attempting to do is create a virtual server in LVS, which has two active REAL servers, however direct traffic only to one of them, unless otherwise directed or if the active member fail, then direct traffic to the backup. I am basically trying to replicate the ldirectord/heartbeat system with piranha/lvs/pulse. Any directions which can be offered would be great appreciated. Regards, Sean _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki