Re: Re : VDC, LBs and IP address selection
Ravi Kumar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I understand that there are many lb vendors coming up with virtualization. The point is whether with those devices can we solve the ip opverlap problems. check my blog http://netlb.blogspot.com where I explained the problem and what the lbs need to implement to work in virtual data center environments. Thanks, -Ravi Chunduru On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Jens Brey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The Radware loadbalancers have a virtualization feature also. But until > yet i, haven't test it, so i can't say how the performance decrease is. > > BR, > Jens > > Surya ARBY schrieb: > > Hello all. > > > > Cisco ACE (4710 and service module for catalyst 6500) implement > > virtual context, so as each context has it's own routing table, you > > can have IP overlapping with no problem. As I know it's the only > > product on the market which supports this feature. > > > > I know it's supposed to come soon in Big-IP (F5), Citrix has a > > virtualization support (within a single unit) coming in CY09, I'm sure > > other vendors will follow. > > > > regards, > > > > Surya > > > > --- En date de : *Lun 23.3.09, Ravi Kumar /<[email protected]>/* a > > écrit : > > > > De: Ravi Kumar <[email protected]> > > Objet: [load balancing] VDC, LBs and IP address selection > > À: [email protected] > > Date: Lundi 23 Mars 2009, 7h06 > > > > Hi List, > > I understand that the data centers are becoming VDCs( Virtual > > Data centers). Virtualization is becoming > > important to implement cloud data centers. In a typical cloud data > > centers, there would be several subscribers hosting > > their servers/services in the cloud. I believe those subscribers > > will be given freedom to choose their own IPs for the servers. > > In such case, there is a chance of IP address clash. How do the > > data centers manage the IPs? > > > > Did any one implemented a solution with load balancers in the > > above cases? I believe, soon Load balancers should > > be tuned to solve similar cases that arise in virtual data centers. > > > > Any comments will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > -Ravi Chunduru > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lb-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l > > Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive > > http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest > > http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lb-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l > > Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive > > http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest > > http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki > > > > _______________________________________________ > lb-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l > Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive > http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest > http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki > _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki