Re : serveriron predictor
Surya ARBY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Do you have some kind of "least response time" of "fastest" predictor available ? Otherwise Weighted round robin (or weighted least conn) may be a good choice if you tune the weight according to the hardware specs of the servers. regards, Surya --- En date de : Mar 23.6.09, Reynald Mahinay <[email protected]> a écrit : De: Reynald Mahinay <[email protected]> Objet: [load balancing] serveriron predictor À: [email protected] Date: Mardi 23 Juin 2009, 7h29 Hello, Just trying to find what's the best predictor to use if you have a group of servers that has differect hardware specifications (e.g. processor, memory,etc.). We have a chasis serveriron here (350), and we wan't to ease the load for those lower machines that are under heavy loads. Our current predictor is set to "least local sessions" and the "Leas Session" guy looks good but unfortunately its available for stackable device only. Appreciate your help on this guys. Thanks and regards, Reynald -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki