Re: Replacement to CSS
Maheshwari <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:55:20 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ed said it all. also you may look at the scalability option for Application thruput and SSL TPS. This will help in future safe investments, easy and faster upgrades avoiding costly forklift upgrades. rgds, G Maheshwri On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Kamlesh Mungekar < [email protected]> wrote: > We have css11505 load balancers configured as a box-to-box > redundancy. We are thinking of moving away since they are almost > reaching end of life cycle. > Does anyone has any opinion which would be the best replacement for > it? We use load balanacer for webfarm load balancing. > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > lb-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l > Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive > http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest > http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki > -- With Warm Regards, G Maheshwari _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki