Re: HAPROXY and POUND X-FORWARD
Ali Abbas <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:45:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.load-balancing.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Brandon Mumby <[email protected]> wrote: > Pound does support cookie persistence. > > > > See: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ > > > He probably means "cookie injection", which pound does not support. Don't forget, as the difference of Haproxy, pound is thread based... more overhead but better scalability on multi-core systems compared to haproxy. Cheers, -- Ali Abbas Blog: http://alouche.net NumExt: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9528 This email contains confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately, and inform us of the mistake by return email. Any form of reproduction, or further dissemination of this email is strictly prohibited. _______________________________________________ lb-l mailing list [email protected] http://vegan.net/mailman/listinfo/lb-l Searchable Archive: http://vegan.net/lb/archive http://lbdigest.com Load Balancing Digest http://lbwiki.com Load Balancing Wiki