Re: [AM] Database "refactoring" effort question
Paul Oldfield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(responding to Graham) > Please replace the column Taxpayer Name (40 characters) > by two columns Taxpayer ForeName (25 characters) and > Taxpayer Surname (25 characters). > > THE QUESTION > How long will it take make this small change > - to the test database? > - to the production database? "How are you intending to supply me with the data I need, that I don't have? I need to know where to split the Taxpayer Name. That data seems to be absent." This isn't a refactoring problem if you are intending to create new data - or capture new data. The refactoring takes little effort. The data capture of the required new data is what will take the effort. Is there any case where, now or in the future, the total length of name would be more than 40 characters? We can truncate the forename now, and deal with the problems on our to-do list. I guess it's an improvement for the Cholmondeley- Hartington-Smythe family that we have an extra 10 characters to play with... Paul Oldfield ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ www.aptprocess.com any opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Mentors of Cally or the Appropriate Process Movement ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h Or send an email to: [email protected] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^----------------------------------------------------------------