Re: [AM] Unfounded assertion
Adrian Howard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday, February 2, 2004, at 11:00 am, Hubert Matthews wrote: > Adrian Howard wrote: > >> The better code review sessions I've been involved were more about >> building the right system >> than they were about preventing mistakes. More "We can refactor that >> out into a new class" >> than "That will die horribly on edge case foo". > > This seems contradictory to me. The first sentence implies an > emphasis on the problem domain, > but the second one seems to value technical matters rather than > problem domain. Can I ask you > to clarify, please? Sorry, my poor communication skills again :-) I was trying to say that better code review sessions often focus more on problem domain stuff (refactoring, etc.) than bugs. Good code reviews as much, if not more, about building the right system than they are about spotting and preventing errors. Clarified? Adrian For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h Or send an email to: [email protected] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^----------------------------------------------------------------