Re: [AM] Code reviews preventative?
"J. B. Rainsberger" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Oldfield wrote: > (responding to J.B.) > >>I have never seen Pair Programming without TDD, although I've >>done TDD without Pair Programming. I may implicitly assume >>that Pair Programming implies TDD. :) > > Not necessarily. > > The situation is complex, but to refactor in safety you need > a full set of regression tests (not necessarily TTD though). > To support Simple Design you need refactoring. > Yet Pair Programming can in theory be done without either > of these. Nice to know, in case you ever find yourself in > such a situation... I am not claiming that Pair Programming is impossible with TDD. I think we all understand that that's obviously false. I /am/ mentioning that I don't know of projects that Pair but do not practise TDD. I'm making an observation of a correlation; and not describing a rule. -- J. B. Rainsberger, Diaspar Software Services http://www.diasparsoftware.com :: +1 416 791-8603 Let's write software that people understand For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h Or send an email to: [email protected] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^----------------------------------------------------------------