RE: [AM] What MDA should be - was ANN: Are You Ready For MDA?
Paul Oldfield <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:43:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(responding to Kari) >> MDA will work when the code IS the model and the model IS the code. >> That would require OO languages like Java and C# to incorporate >> UML-specific concepts like association end and multiplicity, > > In the MDA vision that Mellor et al see, this is not the case. > Modeler/Programmer does not need to see the target language, > ever. I prefer to use the term "Translation" to refer to that approach, to distinguish from the other MDA approaches that I find less than ideal, though possibly still useful. So when I say MDA is "not very useful" I don't include Translation as being part of MDA. translation would be useful if it weren't for just a few remaining problems. Paul Oldfield ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ www.aptprocess.com any opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Mentors of Cally or the Appropriate Process Movement ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h Or send an email to: [email protected] For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit: http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER --^----------------------------------------------------------------