RE: [AM] What MDA should be - was ANN: Are You Ready For MDA?

Paul Oldfield <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:43:54 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile
Message-ID <[email protected]>
(responding to Kari)

>> MDA will work when the code IS the model and the model IS the code. 
>> That would require OO languages like Java and C# to incorporate 
>> UML-specific concepts like association end and multiplicity, 
>
> In the MDA vision that Mellor et al see, this is not the case. 
> Modeler/Programmer does not need to see the target language,
> ever. 

I prefer to use the term "Translation" to refer to that approach, to
distinguish from the other MDA approaches that I find less than
ideal, though possibly still useful.  So when I say MDA is "not
very useful" I don't include Translation as being part of MDA.
translation would be useful if it weren't for just a few remaining
problems.


Paul Oldfield

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
www.aptprocess.com

any opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of
Mentors of Cally or the Appropriate Process Movement
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com
--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h
Or send an email to: [email protected]

For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit:
http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER
--^----------------------------------------------------------------