Re: [AM] Why Traceability? Lean Traceability?
Paul Oldfield <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:07:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.modeling.agile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(responding to Brad) > Each additional degree of complexity tends to require some > additional smattering of one or more of formality or ceremony > for docs, or communication, or additional artifacts. 2 or > 3 of them at once can exceed the "thresh-hold" where its no > longer possible to be comparably "agile" like a modified XP > or SCRUM team, but simply hope to be as lean as feasible and > living with a lot more formality/artifacts than desired. That's in accord with my goal when designing process - "as agile as possible, as robust as necessary". I think we're in agreement. I'll let you get back to working on Mike Beedle - thanks for an enlightening discussion ;-) If you do write up an article, drop us a line here? Paul Oldfield ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ www.aptprocess.com any opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Mentors of Cally or the Appropriate Process Movement ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ For more information about AM, visit the Agile Modeling Home Page at www.agilemodeling.com --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrKDA.bWnbtk.Z2NtYS1h Or send an email to: [email protected] For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit: http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER --^----------------------------------------------------------------