Re: AW: Runtime obesity
"Alejandro F. Reimondo" <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:32:56 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.vwnc,gmane.comp.programming.objects.spanish |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00b801c6422e$b7919ca0$6000a8c0@misraim> |
Hi all, An interesting path to be explored can be the generation of images inside running images (called image gestation). I have built many images and cross-VM images (e.g. building new smalltalk 3D ambiences for entertrainment industry, when we didn´t have a running VM), resulting in interesting images from 80kb -for helloWorld on console- to complete running application environments. The technique start from gestation of a minimum environment inside a running host; and use the host´s tools (browsers and inspectors, & automated nutrition tools) to put methods inside the child image. Then a system tracer is run to dump child image contents (patching and cutting references to host image) and doing custom primitive transforms if required (e.g. when generating cross image development) I have encountered that building images by gestation is much more easy than shrinking running images; because you build the image in a constructive manner (on real running requirements) and not by reduction. One of the most valuable nutrient tools has been method tracers that register method activations. They can be used to record the methods requiered while evaluating an expression in the host image, and then inject the collected methods (and classes) onto the child image. More details and samples can be found at http://www.aleReimondo.com.ar/ImageGestation best, Ale. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Badger" <[email protected]> To: "Vwnc" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:24 PM Subject: Re: AW: Runtime obesity On 08/03/06, Charles A. Monteiro <[email protected]> wrote: > So I'm game if anybody is interested, Bruce perhaps :) Sure! I think a build-up BOF would be fairly short, though: Users: "We want a smaller better understood base.im" Cincom: "We know. We're working on it." All: "Beer!" Perhaps a BOF on "Deployment" would be the way to go. Then we can talk about the base.im for the first 10 seconds, and then talk about RTP and perhaps get input from people using other Smalltalk implementations too. All the best, Bruce -- Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills http://www.openskills.org/