Re: Pragmatic Requirements Summary : update
"Eric Merritt" <cyberlync-/[email protected]> Mon, 04 Aug 2003 01:45:01 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.pragmatic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], "Aryeh M. Friedman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, you don't. You need a machanism to access physical memory locations. > > For example, "peek" & "poke" in various versions of Microsoft Basic. I'll > > admit you need better mechanisms than those, but still the number of > > places that need to access physical memory, even in an OS, is relatively > > small. > > Except for a personal dislike of giving people real power to right code > what is your exact problem with direct memory access? > > --Aryeh Ok lets soften this a bit. Are there specific areas that you think will cuase trouble if we grant direct memory access. If so how do you think the peek/poke/etc solves this problem ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/sO0ANB/LIdGAA/ySSFAA/W4wwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/