Re: Pragmatic Requirements Summary : update

"Eric Merritt" <cyberlync-/[email protected]> Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:50:54 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.pragmatic
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- In [email protected], Matt Lawrence <matt@t...> wrote: 
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Eric Merritt wrote: 
>  
> >  Ok lets soften this a bit. Are there specific areas that you think  
> > will cuase trouble if we grant direct memory access. If so how do you  
> > think the peek/poke/etc solves this problem 
>  
> Yes, using direct memory access as the usual way of accessing data instead  
> of the rarely used way of accessing data.  
 
 I don't believe that anyone said it will be the usual way. We have said we need it, 
but automatic memory management has been a goal since day one, as long as it 
can be disabled and memory managed manually when you need it. 
 
 I think we are on the same page here. 
 
> Check out CERT for examples. 
>  
> -- Matt 
>  
> --  
> From my heart and from my hand, why don't people understand my intention? 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free shipping on all inkjet cartridge & refill kit orders to US & Canada. Low prices up to 80% off. We have your brand: HP, Epson, Lexmark & more.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510
http://us.click.yahoo.com/GHXcIA/n.WGAA/ySSFAA/W4wwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/