Re: Pragmatic Requirements Summary : update
"Eric Merritt" <cyberlync-/[email protected]> Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:50:54 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.pragmatic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], Matt Lawrence <matt@t...> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Eric Merritt wrote: > > > Ok lets soften this a bit. Are there specific areas that you think > > will cuase trouble if we grant direct memory access. If so how do you > > think the peek/poke/etc solves this problem > > Yes, using direct memory access as the usual way of accessing data instead > of the rarely used way of accessing data. I don't believe that anyone said it will be the usual way. We have said we need it, but automatic memory management has been a goal since day one, as long as it can be disabled and memory managed manually when you need it. I think we are on the same page here. > Check out CERT for examples. > > -- Matt > > -- > From my heart and from my hand, why don't people understand my intention? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Free shipping on all inkjet cartridge & refill kit orders to US & Canada. Low prices up to 80% off. We have your brand: HP, Epson, Lexmark & more. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510 http://us.click.yahoo.com/GHXcIA/n.WGAA/ySSFAA/W4wwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/