Re: S-expressions
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:13:35 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.pragmatic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > How many of you out there actually have a problem with s-expressions? For those > of you that do not know s-expressions imply a lisp like syntax, ie > > (some-fun arg2 arg2) > > The reason I ask is becuase s-expressions make quite a bit of the langauge > design easier. Macros become fairly simple, extensions integrate well etc. I tend > to lean to this side of things. However, I am not the only one interested in this > project. As long macros allow you to create a non-infix version at the hll level then no issue from me (it is almost senmantically identical to mstates). --Aryeh ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/W4wwlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/