Re: Re: Ambiguous Refactoring Solution
Adam Sroka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.refactoring |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Donaldson, John (GEO) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Olof, > > > But again - if there is no driving force (fixing errors, adding new > > use cases), I would wait with refactoring. Of course, one driving > > force could be the will to learn refactoring.. > > I'm a little bit worried about this direction. I mean, in the cycle red-green-refactor, we have no motive for the refactoring, other than some nebulous concept of code goodness. So, if you see a class that is too big, and you have some time to spend on improving your code base - then why not? > I empathize with the concern. I think that quality is a sufficient motivation and for those for whom it is not a motivation we should seek to change that. For some, this will not work, but if we are persistent such influences will fade with time (And hopefully, those individuals as well.) ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/