Re: Ambiguous Refactoring Solution

Ron Jeffries <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.refactoring
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello, Richard.  On Thursday, September 24, 2009, at 10:08:17 AM,
you wrote:

> To be axiomatically dogmatic about an activity disengages your
> judgement and leads to silly consequences in the code.

Everyone is likely in favor of judgment. My judgment is that these
things are true:

1. There may exist an actual case where refactoring without tests
   is a best.

2. No one has ever shown a refactoring opportunity of any magnitude
   where it is demonstrable that not testing is best.

3. Getting away with something does not even begin to suggest that
   doing it was a good idea.

Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
www.xprogramming.com/blog
One test is worth a thousand expert opinions.
  -- Bill Nye (The Science Guy)



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.