Re: Ambiguous Refactoring Solution
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.refactoring |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Richard. On Thursday, September 24, 2009, at 10:08:17 AM,
you wrote:
> To be axiomatically dogmatic about an activity disengages your
> judgement and leads to silly consequences in the code.
Everyone is likely in favor of judgment. My judgment is that these
things are true:
1. There may exist an actual case where refactoring without tests
is a best.
2. No one has ever shown a refactoring opportunity of any magnitude
where it is demonstrable that not testing is best.
3. Getting away with something does not even begin to suggest that
doing it was a good idea.
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
www.xprogramming.com/blog
One test is worth a thousand expert opinions.
-- Bill Nye (The Science Guy)
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/