Re: CRAP for C++ ?

--- In [email protected], Srdjan Todorovic <todorovic.s@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> 
> I noticed an interesting Java project called CRAP4J (www.crap4j.org),
> to detect code that smells. While this seems really neat, there's no
> C++ support currently.
> 
> The first 3 pages of Google results seem to only be talking/ranting
> about C++ *being* crap - and this is obviously not what I'm looking
> for.
> 
> Does anyone know of any CRAP frameworks for C++?
> 
> Apologies for cross-posting - I am not sure which of the two lists is
> more concerned with this topic, however this shouldn't be off-topic to
> either.
> 
> Specifically, my problem is that I'm adding unit tests and refactoring
> legacy code, but have no automated way to tell me how much of the
> project has test coverage and what the quality of the test coverage is
> like.
You haven't mentioned what platform or compiler you're using, but gcc has a great coverage system - simply feed the parameter -fprofile-arcs to each compile, run your tests then run the 'gcov' tool to analyse the results.

--
Steve



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/