Re: Self-document code -> dependencies

Yeah, I agree.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Greg Akins <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Chris Morris <[email protected]<the.chrismo%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > If you did a call hierarchy on one of the constants, would a directed
> graph
> > of the methods that call that constant be what you're looking for? I have
> a
>
> Thanks Chris. That's what I'm doing now. I was thinking, though,
> that something that was in such dire need of documentation might be a
> code smell that someone else had run into.. That maybe it would make
> more sense to refactor it into something more "self-documenting" than
> to spend a lot of time documenting the code.
>
>
> --
> Greg Akins
>
> http://insomnia-consulting.org
> http://www.pghcodingdojo.org
> http://pittjug.dev.java.net
>
>  
>



-- 
Chris


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/