Re: Ranking of OO refactorings

The more I think about this problem the more I think C++ is a Bad Idea...

And if you think C++ and Refactoring and Automated Refactoring Assistance
is a Good Idea... it is probably time you look at giving C++ the heave-ho
and skipping on to D.

http://dlang.org/pretod.html


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
>
> OK, I've been thinking about the lack of refactoring support for C++
> for quite a while now. Compared to IntelliJ for Java and ReSharper for
> .NET, the tooling support is relatively weak. So if we were to make a
> prioritized list of what's most important for OO refactoring support,
> how would we rank the refactorings?
>
> Here's my top 10, from most important to least important:
>
> Rename
> Extract Constant/Variable/Field
> Inline Variable
> Invert Conditional
> Extract Method
> Extract Interface
> Split Variable
> Move Method
> Inline Method
> Extract Subclass/Superclass
>
> How do you rank refactorings?
>
> Do you have refactorings you consider important that aren't on my top 10?
>
> Do you have a different ranking of the same 10?
> --
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>  
>



-- 
John Carter
Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
Tait Electronics
PO Box 1645 Christchurch
New Zealand

-- 

------------------------------
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended recipient. 
It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be the subject of legal 
or other privilege, none of which is waived or lost by reason of this 
transmission.
If you are not an intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, 
distribute or reproduce such email, any attachments, or any part thereof. 
If you have received a message in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been altered or 
corrupted during transmission nor can we guarantee that any email or any 
attachments are free from computer viruses or other conditions which may 
damage or interfere with recipient data, hardware or software. The 
recipient relies upon its own procedures and assumes all risk of use and of 
opening any attachments.
------------------------------


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/