| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Hi Charles,
> On Jun 12, 2015, at 6:25 PM, Charles Bradley - Professional Scrum Trainer and Coach [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ron, I agree that it is unclear... but let me see if I can make it better, then if I can, I'll suggest changes to Jeff (He and I had traded emails earlier on clearing up the article).
>
> Imagine these notes under the headings as such:
>
> The Process Takes Three Meetings to Initialize
> (In the Review Template <http://jeffsutherland.com/review_template.html> linked down below, this section refers to the "Individual Performance" part of that Review Template)
>
> and..
> The Review Ratings
> (In the Review Template <http://jeffsutherland.com/review_template.html> linked down below, this section refers to the "Development Team Rating..." part of that Review Template)
>
> While this may not be the best way to fix the article -- does the above help your "shared understanding" of how the review process works?
>
> (One other "hole" is who does the "Company Rating" on the Review Template)
Might work. As it is, it won’t compile, much less run. :)
Ron Jeffries
ronjeffries.com <http://ronjeffries.com/>
Master your instrument, master the music, then forget all that shit and just play. -- Charlie Parker