Re: Re: Adoption Versus Transformation
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There used to be the term "agile transition". I still like it. It sounds less like an instant, magic transformation but like the hell of a lot of work and time it actually takes. It is a process. -- Alexander Kriegisch http://scrum-master.de > Am 10.10.2015 um 18:16 schrieb [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]>: > > > > > It's not a company roll out, yet, however that's the long term hope of our internal sponsors. > > Here I think I'm aligned with Ron (and many others). The idea of an Agile "roll out" is absolutely horrible. Imposing anything on a workforce is surely the anathema of Agile. To impose Agile... well, you see the ugly irony. > > I like the term "transformation" as it indicates an intent. I prefer it without the "Agile" label. Agile can be a part of the transformation, which I'd hope, in essence, would be a transformation away from a hurtful, ineffective, disengaging environment towards a kind, effective and engaging one. You cannot roll that out, you can only nurture it. > > Tobias > > > >
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed