Re: Re: Adoption Versus Transformation

"Alexander Kriegisch [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There used to be the term "agile transition". I still like it. It sounds less like an instant, magic transformation but like the hell of a lot of work and time it actually takes. It is a process.
-- 
Alexander Kriegisch
http://scrum-master.de


> Am 10.10.2015 um 18:16 schrieb [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]>:
> 
> 
> 
> > It's not a company roll out, yet, however that's the long term hope of our internal sponsors. 
> 
> Here I think I'm aligned with Ron (and many others). The idea of an Agile "roll out" is absolutely horrible. Imposing anything on a workforce is surely the anathema of Agile. To impose Agile... well, you see the ugly irony.
> 
> I like the term "transformation" as it indicates an intent. I prefer it without the "Agile" label. Agile can be a part of the transformation, which I'd hope, in essence, would be a transformation away from a hurtful, ineffective, disengaging environment towards a kind, effective and engaging one. You cannot roll that out, you can only nurture it.
> 
> Tobias
> 
> 
> 
>
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.