Re: Is Agile truly scaleable?

"Nayan Hajratwala [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:49:39 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

FWIW, this topic was cross posted to the XP mailing list a few days back. Here’s the thread: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/extremeprogramming/conversations/topics/160050 <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/extremeprogramming/conversations/topics/160050>

---
Nayan Hajratwala - 734.658.6032 - http://agileshrugged.com - @nhajratw

> On Apr 11, 2016, at 4:50 AM, [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> In the last company I worked for, I found Agile to be clumsy and un-scaleable. Bearing all of this in mind, can it actually be scaleable (SAFe seems like a flawed mutation of Agile rather than a genuine solution). This article makes me believe that this could be a better methodology: Slaying the Agile Dragon: The age of agile will soon be over <http://goo.gl/Q0h5ye>. What do you all suggest? How do you make it work?
> 
>  <http://goo.gl/Q0h5ye>
> Slaying the Agile Dragon: The age of agile will soon be ... <http://goo.gl/Q0h5ye>
> Agile is clumsy, un-scaleable and lacks any appreciation of software architecture. So why do people worship at the Church of Agile? It is time for change; Winter is...
> View on goo.gl <http://goo.gl/Q0h5ye>
> Preview by Yahoo
> 
> 
> 
>

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 842 B)