Re: Modern Waterfall [1 Attachment]

That's so awesome! I'm laughing so hard I'm crying. 

In case you missed this:



> On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:21 PM, 'Richard Hundhausen' [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I love that site. We should stand up a new for ScaledWaterfall2017 or something. :-)
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] Modern Waterfall
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I hear it was presented at `Waterfall 2006`.
> 
>  
> 
> https://www.waterfall2006.com/
> 
>  
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Tim
> 
> 021 251 5593
> 
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/drtimwright 
> 
>  
> 
> On 29 August 2017 at 16:46, Michael James [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> Somehow "modern waterfall" disturbs me less than traditional methods masquerading as Agile (e.g. SAFe).  At least it's clearly labeled as waterfall.  
> 
>  
> 
> --mj
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Michael Wollin [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> Now I've heard everything. My client has a thing called "modern waterfall." I haven't gotten access privileges to the spec yet, but I shudder. Something about using Jira for requirements. Oy!
> 
> Michael
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
>