RE: Modern Waterfall
"'Rohan D'Sa' [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:48:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ0UEjipEQmE19ZOt+XWfOkajKv6B3uhphK-wx8Swn2H61DCug@mail.gmail.com> |
The ScaledHighIntensityTraditional (SH*T) model sounds appropriate. Regards, Rohan On 31 Aug 2017 19:30, "'Richard Hundhausen' [email protected] mailto:[email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I love that site. We should stand up a new for ScaledWaterfall2017 or something. :-) From: SCRUMDEVELOPMENT@yahoogroups. com mailto:[email protected] [mailto:SCRUMDEVELOPMENT@ yahoogroups.com mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:52 AM To: SCRUMDEVELOPMENT@yahoogroups. com mailto:[email protected] Subject: Re: [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] Modern Waterfall I hear it was presented at `Waterfall 2006`. https://www.waterfall2006.com/ https://www.waterfall2006.com/ Tim -- Tim 021 251 5593 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ drtimwright http://www.linkedin.com/in/drtimwright On 29 August 2017 at 16:46, Michael James [email protected] mailto:[email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <SCRUMDEVELOPMENT@yahoogroups. com mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Somehow "modern waterfall" disturbs me less than traditional methods masquerading as Agile (e.g. SAFe). At least it's clearly labeled as waterfall. --mj On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Michael Wollin [email protected] mailto:[email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <SCRUMDEVELOPMENT@yahoogroups. com mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Now I've heard everything. My client has a thing called "modern waterfall." I haven't gotten access privileges to the spec yet, but I shudder. Something about using Jira for requirements. Oy! Michael