RE: Re: SIP is "just another Six Sigma measure"?
"Kent Beck" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:10:31 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.software-in-process |
|---|---|
| Organization | Three Rivers Institute |
| Message-ID | <001d01c2c180$c5efd8c0$0201000a@KentsT30> |
I'm writing a tool called Java Spider, which helps people understand complicated Java programs. I'm writing it for my own long-term use because I need to quickly understand out-of-control programs as part of my business. Investment in Spider ought to be accounted for as a capital investment resulting in a liability. However, I also want to generate revenue with it. In the Open Source world it is considered unethical to generate revenue by charging for the software, so I'm offering sponsorships, a la Formula I racing. Looked at as a revenue generator, my understanding is that I should account for investment in Spider as an expense resulting in an asset. I'm probably completely confused. I spend an hour on Spider. What transactions go into which accounts? Kent -----Original Message----- From: sentto-8007113-369-1043165047-kent=threeriversinstitute.org@returns.grou ps.yahoo.com [mailto:sentto-8007113-369-1043165047-kent=threeriversinstitute.org@retu rns.groups.yahoo.com] On Behalf Of Dan Palanza Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:03 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Carol Findell; [email protected] Subject: Re: [SIP] Re: SIP is "just another Six Sigma measure"? There is a different type of software product. Suppose that a double entry bookkeeping framework could serve all of many just in time assemble lines. That type of product is set into motion as a function of policy more typical of building a factory, or of buying machinery. In accounting jargon, where the unique application is a function of current costs, the universal application is a function long term capital investment. My initial argument to Kent is that software ought to be more often in the later category.