Re: Re: SIP is "just another Six Sigma measure"?
Dossy <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:29:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.software-in-process |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2003.02.01, Dan Palanza <[email protected]> wrote: > > Imagine top down in the precise pattern that you now do XP. Say I sell a > house. The simplest thing that can possibly work is to record the sale in a > single transaction. And so I do so and my books are in order. Then I get a > story card that requests differentiating the cost of the foundation from > the cost of the remaining structure. And so I break my single transaction > into two transactions that carry the same total. I keep working the story > cards until I have recorded a history of the building's details to the > satisfaction of all users of the bookkeeping data. Vendor accounts-payable, > customer accounts-receivable, bank balances, payroll, interest on loans, > etc. How can you apply this refinement of record keeping detail to software development? How much record keeping is "just enough" to compute SIP? -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [email protected] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/