Re: SWIG: Bug with 'C' arrays of zero size ?
Arnaud RICHARD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.swig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AM7PR10MB38579DAB049872223C8A1D22F69C0@AM7PR10MB3857.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
As far as I know, in C data[] is not defining a 0-sized array but a pointer equivalent to *data with a hint for the reader that the pointer will be used for an array. Considering this, SWIG behavior seems correct. Arnaud > -----Original Message----- > From: Alberto Luaces <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2020 10:31 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Swig-user] SWIG: Bug with 'C' arrays of zero size ? > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, at 10:37, Terry Barnaby wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If you have a data structure like the following all is well: > > > > struct DataBlock { > > Header header; > > char data[4]; ///< The packet data }; > > > > However if you have a data structure that has a zero length array like > > the following, SWIG considers the "char data[]" as a pointed to data > > and tries to delete[] and allocate memory for it. > > > > struct DataBlock { > > Header header; > > char data[]; ///< The packet data }; > > > > I think this is a bug ? > > Are you using C++? It seems that zero-sized arrays are not allowed: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6180012/array-with-size-0#6180200 > > > _______________________________________________ > Swig-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swig-user _______________________________________________ Swig-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swig-user