Re: arrays_csharp.i and INOUT[] generating wrong code?

Since half a week has passed and nobody responded, I guess my question was
"wrong" ?

I am stuck, and can't get this problem fixed on my own. Please help.

Am Do., 7. Jan. 2021 um 15:35 Uhr schrieb Carlos Frederico Biscaya <
[email protected]>:

> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to generate proper wrapping code for a c++ struct that looks
> like this:
>
> struct ImportantDataConst
> {
>    static const unsigned short arraySize = 33;
>    unsigned short someUShortArray2[arraySize];
> };
>
> applying the unsigned short INOUT[] typemaps from arrays_csharp.i to the
> contained array like this:
> %apply unsigned short INOUT[] {unsigned short
> someUShortArray2[ImportantDataConst::arraySize]}
>
> which creates
>  public ushort[] someUShortArray2 {
>     set {
>
> SwigExperimentWrapperPINVOKE.ImportantDataConst_someUShortArray2_set(swigCPtr,
> value);
>     }
>     get {
>       global::System.IntPtr cPtr =
> SwigExperimentWrapperPINVOKE.ImportantDataConst_someUShortArray2_get(swigCPtr);
>       SWIGTYPE_p_unsigned_short ret = (cPtr == global::System.IntPtr.Zero)
> ? null : new SWIGTYPE_p_unsigned_short(cPtr, false);
>       return ret;
>     }
>   }
>
> Given the fact that ret is of type SWIGTYPE_p_unsigned_short and the
> return type of the property is ushort[], I don't believe this is right. The
> consequence is, that this code won't build. BTW. I get the same kind of
> behaviour, when I use an OUTPUT[] typemap instead of INOUT[].
>
> Is there a way to fix this quickly? Or am I missing something?
>
> I would be truely grateful for any suggestions.
>
> Br,
> Fred
>

_______________________________________________
Swig-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swig-user