Re: Why are non-const typemaps matching const parameters?
Lindley French <[email protected]> Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:41:46 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.swig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALwtg07sjb_ATOmJwX0yUPhTcK=RcCByrq3RcJj6MQh6ii-GJQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Ah, so it turns out SWIG strips qualifies when trying to find a matching typemap. We need to intercept that by providing empty-string argout typemaps for the const types. On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 10:02 AM Lindley French <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm trying to make it so that argout typemaps are only applied to > non-const parameters. On a function F(const T*) I want only the in typemap > for T; on a function G(T*) I want both the in and argout typemaps for T. > > I'm doing this: > > %typemap(in) TYPE {...} > %typemap(argout) OUTPUT_TYPE {...} > > %apply TYPE { T&, T*, const T&, const T* } > %apply OUTPUT_TYPE { T&, T* } > > However, I can see in the generated code that the argout typemap is being > used for the const T* case. What's going on and how can I fix it? > _______________________________________________ Swig-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swig-user