Re: Unit tests and parameter validation

Eb <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.test-driven-development
Message-ID <CANEY99ZZj3x_gY49g5X6V_4dq7X9Y3T9b-T3mpnX=J4PWxA+8g@mail.gmail.com>
Ron -

Keith gave an example of such a scenario. The outside object doesn't
necessarily meet the needs of the inside object.  I personally, rarely get
expectations right (being complete) the first - maybe there is a
programming practice that I need to incorporate.  Maybe going outside in
reduces the number of iterations of such manner but I've definitely
"discovered" that something needs to be changed to meet expectations.

Eb


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Eb,
>
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Eb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok. But I've experienced that developing outside in also.
>
>
> Really? You developed some outside object, and then went to develop an
> inside object, and it didn't meet the needs of the object, already
> existing, that was calling it??
>
> How did that happen?
>
> Ron Jeffries
> www.XProgramming.com
> Everything that needs to be said has already been said.
> But since no one was listening, everything must be said again. -- Andre
> Gide
>
>  
>



-- 
blog: http://eikonne.wordpress.com
twitter: @eikonne
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.