Re: More Typing, Less Testing: TDD with Static Types

This is definitely a case of "old wine in a new bottle." That said, if the
particular bottling of the concepts speaks to an audience in ways that
earlier formulations didn't, it has value.

Much of what is written in part 2 reflects the weakness of earlier Java as
compared to modern Java. I want to go back over the examples myself,
working in C#. So I guess the bottling does even appeal to me!

Charlie

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Josue Barbosa dos Santos
[email protected] [testdrivendevelopment] <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> I found this blog posts about TDD and typing. The first is a introduction
> and the second is an example using the same example in the book of Kent
> Beck (Test Driven Development by Example).
>
> The author claim that thinking int the types first leads to a better code
> than the pure use of TDD as did by Kent in the book.
>
> More Typing, Less Testing: TDD with Static Types, Part 1
> http://spin.atomicobject.com/2014/12/09/typed-language-tdd-part1/
>
> More Typing, Less Testing: TDD with Static Types, Part 2
> http://spin.atomicobject.com/2014/12/10/typed-language-tdd-part2/
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> Abraços,
> Josué
> http://twitter.com/josuesantos
>
>  
>