Re: Giving Up on TDD
"Avi Kessner [email protected] [testdrivendevelopment]" <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:13:19 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.test-driven-development |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGEhWpGQEZ0SPey5Q2A0TxXN++Lg5bntCxi7myWVAnMdNFgexQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Sounded like he said he does TDD in his head, since he has enough experience to know when and how to do that. Didn't sound like a rejection of TDD to me. On Mar 31, 2016 4:48 PM, "Alan Baljeu [email protected] [testdrivendevelopment]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A more credentialed rejection of TDD, coming from Dave Thomas, one of the > original writers of the Agile Manifesto (which for reasons he explains > here, he would rather call a manifesto on agility). The linked time > discusses about the value of testing practices . > > Agile is Dead • Pragmatic Dave Thomas > <https://youtu.be/a-BOSpxYJ9M?t=17m27s> > > > [image: image] <https://youtu.be/a-BOSpxYJ9M?t=17m27s> > > > > > > Agile is Dead • Pragmatic Dave Thomas > <https://youtu.be/a-BOSpxYJ9M?t=17m27s> > View on youtu.be <https://youtu.be/a-BOSpxYJ9M?t=17m27s> > Preview by Yahoo > > > > Alan Baljeu > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "Avi Kessner [email protected] [testdrivendevelopment]" < > [email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:46 AM > *Subject:* Re: [TDD] Giving Up on TDD > > > I have to shake my head that the need for TDD still isn't better > understood. > I guess the current generation has been living their whole life where > "Nothing ever works", that they see no need to ensure that it does, > actually indeed work. > > I'm glad to see that at least there is agreement that tests are needed at > some point, but they still don't seem to get that TDD is the only way to > have confirmation as to what areas of your code needs testing. > > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > and the number 47 > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Josue Barbosa dos Santos > [email protected] [testdrivendevelopment] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > For Knowledge > > http://www.infoq.com/news/2016/03/tdd > > > > > >