Re: FitNesse integration
[email protected] Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:04:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.fit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Micah Martin" <[email protected]> To: "'FIT Developers'" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:46 PM Subject: RE: [Fit-dev] FitNesse integration > There are a few new files but the only changed file is Fixture.java. > - pulled out Counts class > - added listener field > - modified doTables(..) > + calls listener.tableFinished(...) after doing a table > + calls listener.tablesFinished(...) before returning > > Micah That's what I thought. John Roth > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:31 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Fit-dev] FitNesse integration > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Micah Martin" > > <[email protected]> > > To: "'FIT Developers'" > > <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:12 PM > > Subject: [Fit-dev] FitNesse integration > > > > > > > Code is worth a thousand words. > > > > > > This code should express my intent. > > > Using the Listener idea Ward suggested I implemented the > > chunking ability > > > (in Java). This required only minor changes to the Fixture class; > > although > > > I did rip out the inner Counts class and put it in it's own > > file. Two new > > > classes for this are FixtureListener (Interface) and > > NullFixtureListener > > > which is used by default in Fixture > > > > > > I also wrote a new implementation of FitFilter. I call it FitServer > > though > > > becuase thats what it feels like. It will handle multiple > > test executions > > > and represents all the functionallity I've mentioned to > > integrate with > > > FitNesse. > > > > > > Of course I'm interested in comments. > > > > > > Micah > > > > It looks fairly straightforward. Do we want to do it this way? > > If so, I'll go ahead and put it into the Python version, which will > > be uploded to CVS whenever we get the FIT cvs straightened > > away. > > > > One point: I can't tell whether I missed any changes because diff > > got confused by the changes in indentation format. > > > > John Roth > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fit-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freepan.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fit-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freepan.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fit-dev