Re: FitNesse integration

[email protected] Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:04:54 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.fit.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Micah Martin" <[email protected]>
To: "'FIT Developers'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Fit-dev] FitNesse integration


> There are a few new files but the only changed file is Fixture.java.
> - pulled out Counts class
> - added listener field
> - modified doTables(..)
> + calls listener.tableFinished(...) after doing a table
> + calls listener.tablesFinished(...) before returning
>
> Micah

That's what I thought.

John Roth
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:31 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Fit-dev] FitNesse integration
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Micah Martin"
> > <[email protected]>
> > To: "'FIT Developers'"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:12 PM
> > Subject: [Fit-dev] FitNesse integration
> >
> >
> > > Code is worth a thousand words.
> > >
> > > This code should express my intent.
> > > Using the Listener idea Ward suggested I implemented the
> > chunking ability
> > > (in Java).  This required only minor changes to the Fixture class;
> > although
> > > I did rip out the inner Counts class and put it in it's own
> > file.  Two new
> > > classes for this are FixtureListener (Interface) and
> > NullFixtureListener
> > > which is used by default in Fixture
> > >
> > > I also wrote a new implementation of FitFilter.  I call it FitServer
> > though
> > > becuase thats what it feels like.  It will handle multiple
> > test executions
> > > and represents all the functionallity I've mentioned to
> > integrate with
> > > FitNesse.
> > >
> > > Of course I'm interested in comments.
> > >
> > > Micah
> >
> > It looks fairly straightforward. Do we want to do it this way?
> > If so, I'll go ahead and put it into the Python version, which will
> > be uploded to CVS whenever we get the FIT cvs straightened
> > away.
> >
> > One point: I can't tell whether I missed any changes because diff
> > got confused by the changes in indentation format.
> >
> > John Roth
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fit-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.freepan.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fit-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fit-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freepan.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fit-dev