RE: Brain Dump of Towards FIT 1.0 OpenSpace session

I think you need native implementations for /some/ applications but
probably not for all or most. But having a native implementation is
probably a big factor in getting many people to adopt Fit.

Besides, this is open source and people like to tinker with it.

Charlie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jim Little
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:05 PM
> To: 'FIT Developers'
> Subject: RE: [Fit-dev] Brain Dump of Towards FIT 1.0 OpenSpace session
> 
> 
> From: Al Chou
> > Rather than ... having FIT re-implemented in numerous 
> > languages, why not have one core FIT that allows fixtures 
> > to be written in whatever language you choose?
> 
> That's an interesting idea.  But would it work?  Consider that we need
> to be able to write fixtures that interface with the system under test.
> Those fixtures need to be in the programmer's native language, as he may
> not know Java.  We also want (I presume) to make Fit inviting for people
> to adopt... can we use this approach and still do that?
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fit-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freepan.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fit-dev