Cross-platfrom Fit (Was: Brain Dump of Towards FIT 1.0 OpenSpace session)

From: [email protected]
> One of the things I like about separating things is that there's one
> code base to put most new features in. I think the native adapters
> would be significantly more stable. They're also the place where there
> would be the most variation.

That's the attraction for me, too.  It gets at the question of what our
cross-platform strategy is.  Do we try to keep Fit as one coordinated
project that supports multiple languages?  Or as a reference
implementation with lots of uncoordinated ports, a la JUnit?  Or a core
idea with a gazillion completely different approaches, a la Wiki?

Ultimately, it's Ward's call.  I've been approaching it as if we wanted
one coordinated project, because that's what I seem to remember Ward
talking about when we created the C# port.

Jim