Re: Type conversion (Was: Brain Dump of TowardsFIT1.0OpenSpace session)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Little" <[email protected]>
To: "'FIT Developers'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: Type conversion (Was: [Fit-dev] Brain Dump of
TowardsFIT1.0OpenSpace session)


> From: [email protected]
> > Also, __str__() doesn't always return what's needed. One of
> > the major issues is, of course, floating point compare precision,
> > which I have covered with a special entry in my type dictionary.
>
> Isn't this what the ScientificDouble type (included with Fit) is for?

I've been ignoring Scientific Double, since I have a different solution
for the Python port. I suppose I should look at it, though.

John Roth
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fit-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freepan.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fit-dev