Re: distinguishing getters and setters

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Freeman" <[email protected]>
To: "FIT Developers" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Fit-dev] distinguishing getters and setters

Ilja Preuß wrote:

> +1 for '?'
>
> '=' works well for formulas, but looks rather strange for other
> assertions, imho.
>
> Take care, Ilja

[Steve Freeman]

can't we support both?


[John Roth]
I don't have any problem with both. Also, I was thinking
that the '?' shouldn't be too much of a problem for
Fitnesse since there's already a request to not process
a lot of the markup in tables. Micah would remember that.

Doing it this way supports properties as well. That's
not an issue for the current Java implementation, but
I think they're coming for Java 1.5, and they're certainly
availible in other languages.

John Roth