Re: On CI

William Blevins <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel
Message-ID <CALJHx11Oi2SYBA8egYX4fg1po=fSBbVTVdTkqEVUqF4dZ-Y=Yg@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 25, 2016 6:57 AM, "Russel Winder" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Independent of any CI Bill is running with Buildbot, I think we should
> make use of any and all CI that Atlassian and others connect to
> BitBucket, in the same way TravisCI etc. connect into GitHub.
>
> Having three or four CI instances all monitoring GitHub repositories
> and running tests on every commit and every pull request provides a lot
> of very useful support.
>
> Whilst BitBucket is now clearly a Git resource, it is still providing
> Mercurial services and the pull requests and general management is
> effectively as good as GitHub. If BitBucket can do issue handling, pull
> requests, repository management, and CI (the big one), more or less as
> well as GitHub, then there seems no reason to abandon BitBucket. In
> fact exactly the opposite, if we can avoid moving from BitBucket now,
> that is a good thing.
>
> Switching from Mercurial to Git however is a completely different
> issue. In the short term there is no big deal per se (other than most
> of the core developers want to use Git not Mercurial!). However it is
> clear Atlassian are pitching BitBucket as a Git repository management
> system. In effect, as people at O'Reilly said in 2006-ish, Git has won
> the DVCS war. Mercurial is though a contender left in the main game,
> all others are now just history with niche markets. (Sad, I liked
> Bazaar.)
>
> I am going to start using the issue tracker on my Python 3 SCons port,
> that William is now also tinkering in, to see how it feels. Also I will
> try out as many CI systems as I can connect in so as to run Python 2.7
> and Python 3.4 tests for each commit and pull request. I am expecting
> some glitches compared to GitHub, but I am confident Atlassian will be
> fixing things.
>
> I note immediately that the BitBucket issues system is not JIRA. I am
> assuming it is a stripped down, loss leader version to sell JIRA
> instances.
>

We may be able to get free Jira by applying open source. Atlassian
otherwise will not give out non-free Jira to the plebeians.
> --
> Russel.
>
=============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
sip:[email protected]
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.