Re: Python 3 strategy

Yeah we wouldn't delete the current changes.
On Jan 25, 2016 3:22 PM, "Gary Oberbrunner" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The alternative is to abandon the current python3-port and start again
>> from default based solely on future.
>>
>
> This doesn't seem crazy to me, although there was a LOT of hand-tweaking
> of code on the current python3 branch: utf8/locale stuff, print stmts,
> which in a fair number of cases didn't look like any automation would've
> caught them. So if you start again I suspect most of that work will have to
> be redone. I spent a couple of days on it, iirc, and I wasn't the only one.
> Maybe some of those changes could be cherry-picked over? I suggest skimming
> some of my changes on that branch (not the merges, just the by-hand stuff)
> to get a sense of what had to be done.
>
> --
> Gary
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev