Re: Python3 activity

I would personally make it a separate file. I'm a very OOP-centric geek.

V/R,
William

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Vasily <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any answer to my question about the place and approach for stubprocess to
> live in?
>
> Thanks,
> Vasily
> 16 янв. 2016 г. 0:17 пользователь "Vasily" <[email protected]>
> написал:
>
> I have started looking into the docs for integrating stubprocess in there.
>>
>> My current thoughts are to put it as a separate file next to posix.py in
>> "Platform", any objections to this approach? Should I maybe put it to
>> "compat"?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vasily
>> 15 янв. 2016 г. 21:05 пользователь "Bill Deegan" <
>> bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> написал:
>>
>>> I'm not going to merge any pull request for such until 2.5 is out though.
>>>
>>> Is anyone able to work on getting stubprocess logic into 2.5?
>>> If not I'll roll up 2.5 this weekend.
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9tAWLNoT+7d/@public.gmane.orgm
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1.
>>>>
>>>> I'll see if I can get a python 3.5 buildbot slave up soon.
>>>>
>>>> -Bill
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:01 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Will try to do some more on this over the weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I got stuck on the weird os.mkinfo problem (still unsolved) and got a
>>>>>> bit distracted by Me TV rewrite ­required to be ready soon so as to
>>>>>> watch the 6 Nations games. New DVB-T2 USB sticks arriving tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the really up-side, it appears that "futurize -1" is properly
>>>>>> idempotent, making it a lot easier to work with than anything
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aim is still to get the code-base working properly, i.e passing all
>>>>>> tests, as a Python 2.7 program, so that it can then become the default
>>>>>> branch. My thinking here is that if we do not have a separate branch,
>>>>>> but instead are evolving default to be Python 3 compatible as a Python
>>>>>> 2.7 codebase then Python 3 usage will happen faster. The "down side"
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> that all Python 2 code must be written with Python 3 compliance from
>>>>>> merge time on on, this includes all pull requests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Russel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =============================================================================
>>>>>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
>>>>>> sip:[email protected]
>>>>>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp:
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev