Re: Mercurial remote tracking
Russel Winder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 13:12 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > […] > > Qt allows to build beautiful interfaces. Don't you agree with that? As does GTK+3, Cocoa, wxWidgets, etc. The toolkit is only an enabler, the UI designer and implementer have to the really hard work. […] > You avoid rebasing in Git? Why? It can cause extra work, and what is the point. I think the only use case for rebase (other than with the svn plugin) is to create changesets for pull requests from a repository that has never been published. I tend to publish repositories and take pull requests, so when creating the final pull request, to rebase would be to invalidate rather than simply amend, history. […] > > what's the point of "rather use Git" if you don't rebase? Do you use > GitHub - is that the reason? This single most important reason is transient in-repo branches. Mercurial persistent named branches are a right royal pain, Git internal branches are great for feature working. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlauR8AACgkQ+ooS3F10Be+n/wCglgrTwHn8yYl1V6hyzd3mQI6/ YmQAn1z0uTImykuVQSxyPEY3ruD09KhD =zOFl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----