Re: Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons
anatoly techtonik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPkN8xJwjF5n9v+3MmzOmUdcYs=acfKAtSAcydHKqAtFdn1u-A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:57 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There is an interesting thread, which needs some >>> consensus. >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/302/change-the-cache-to-use-2-character/ >>> >> >> "consensus" between whom? And what is your concrete idea about how this >> consensus should be reached? It looks to me as if the issue has been >> properly discussed among the people that are actively working on the pull >> request...and they've reached a consensus already. >> One that I support too, I might add... > > > I think that a script of this nature should be revision controlled with the > software release that it is related to. I'm not sure when this script should > be removed sadly. I am not for removing the script. I am against adding it to PATH. Let people do migrations, but they can discover and/or download the script the other way. So I am comfortable with it in main SCons repository. -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev