Re: Python 3
Tim Jenness <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 03:21 , Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 22:10 +0100, William Blevins wrote: >> Tim, >> >> I think Russel was the last person work on this in depth. I was >> helping >> some, but I was waiting for a decision about using six vs futurize. >> I'm not >> 100% sure there was a decision made, but it has been active pseudo- >> recently. >> >> https://bitbucket.org/russel/scons__python3 >> > > I had to go away for a while, sorry about that. Hopefully I can get on > with this a lot more in the next few days. > > As far as I remember we had made the decision to ditch six. Step 1 is > to make the code futurize -1 compliant and run under Python 2.7 then to > decide whether to have the futurize dependency so as to go the whole > Python 3.5 thing. The doubt was that some people didn't want the > futurize dependency. > > I believe the idea is that now that the python3 branch is up-to-date > with all default changesets, once 2.5 is released we can merge the > python3 branch into default and then do all work solely on default. > Sounds great. I’ll try to help (although I’m a git/github person and I’ve never used hg/bitbucket) but I’ll be happy to talk and try it out on our fairly substantial scons environment. — Tim Jenness _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev