Re: Python 3
"Eric S. Raymond" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Russel Winder <[email protected]>: > As far as I remember we had made the decision to ditch six. Step 1 is > to make the code futurize -1 compliant and run under Python 2.7 then to > decide whether to have the futurize dependency so as to go the whole > Python 3.5 thing. The doubt was that some people didn't want the > futurize dependency. Read this: Practical Python Porting for Systems Programmers: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/practical-python-porting/ In summary, it's possible (and not actually very difficult) to write Python that runs under either 2.7 or 3.x. The above is a step-by-step guide with links to real examples, e.g. larg e Python programs that have been successfully ported this way. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 811 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUBVv6sQezIII+MbHONAQL2lA//dXwu3I7dKQGxi/EAdTVE4PKiHUkepQlj rQz+W5DPwnlp3ogMK6CxAbIUHGIT3DFPnaaNuZXYRovuOgKsMca05E5BWN8gU6P+ ITyPf1kh0qSJVM3R3iRlEWbV8aS30AppjMAsFR+iqtAQzpHtP2sMMjVqc81D6jxR GjByvNtdSRy3yQVX42IwOoXq1PKuFZoRgmom9sCikkpPTsHPhcs3yzrNTNCKxnLR T9oPHzCCJrID5u9qtHNSbDn3QzyXtGmFe5aNhErbEIdCmMNHOQlbWT75IUaCBqZX u3bSJrjzLmr1GCBKkWzgA3Ox0Oi5JDsrxN0WSh8Q2mR3be6Wwqm/TOJg1LK032Tz 3yIjpxWTIwCyEWPQuTyBP0Iz7mDF+mcZjOqvBzFdW1iTvwJ3yKO0EQ1OPGCR301j keBUsr3wZ/UFOkZXHk6C6X+rmlxsibaQxhYSQ23kDxC2flx1MrFnVrT3g8+cGSHO H2iFJm+/4ZP3n1qVI74BZzpVb3RudtWJ332bqR1ZGwQ4aivhboyzr0xCLrSq3jX1 EKEb5FNoTqnQAUzFb5A0tIJVl29iaGzXRMy/DIFs2gz3ejqvBRG0NLTqN6MMUx3X PLM/dE/G1EHHzYvXMaW+PAEzjsDO1Z59pCV4ltOYQYPYYaGvqAUlF6mLbzJZQSJW bS/GjTU5trU= =Zk0p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----