Re: SCons default branch open for python 2.7/3.x work. Please submit pull requests

Hi,

On 10.04.2016 20:56, Bill Deegan wrote:
> All,
>
> Here's what I propose.
> 1. Merge scons_python3 down to default.  It's o.k if it's broken for a bit. We can always do bug fixes out of rel_2.5.0 branch if
> needed and merge those down.
> 2. I'm o.k. with many tests failing when merged down to default. Python 2/3 is a major project and move forward for SCons.  As far
> as fixing those embedded code strings, I'd like to see a pull request per fix (so it's easy to review).   If we're talking about
> moving them to the new test fixtures  (see: "working with fixtures" in
> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DeveloperGuide/TestingMethodology), I'm all for that.
>

+1 from me (as described in my latest mail to scons-dev). But we still need to fit "stubprocess.py" into the schedule 
somewhere...sorry for repeating this over and over again. But I still think it's crucial to have it, in order to finally shake off 
the "SCons is slow" rumours completely.

Regards,

Dirk