Re: Should we close python3-port branch in scons bitbucket?

Russel Winder <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:11:58 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 12:45 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote:
> Russel,
> 
> I guess the other question is the python3-port branch in scons' repo
> an
> earlier version of your branch?
> Or is your branch entirely different?
> 

My python3-port branch is a continuation of the original python3-port
branch so I guess in Mercurial terms they are the same branch. This
should mean that my python3-port branch can be merged into mainline
python3-port branch without difficulty. If this is the case and we can
set up CI on the python3-port branch we could run with the two branches
active in mainline until both are green.

If there were an embargo on changesets into mainline default until
mainline python3-port was merged back in, then this would seem to be
functionally equivalent to merging python3-port into default now at the
expense of having a new CI set up.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[email protected]
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)